Monday, February 06, 2006
fire the housekeeper, i am back !!!!!
*creeeeekkkkk*
wow, it's been a long time. i see you haven't clean since i have been gone. this blog is getting dusty and miskept....
so i am reading a lot about the cartoons from the denmark newspaper that are pissing off muslims around the world. apparently any depiction of the prophet is considered blasphemous.
in this day and age, i can't believe the word blasphemous is still being written in the media. but anyway, what are your thoughts on this?
do you:
1) think that people are too sensitive and should support the freedom of expression even if they don't agree with what is being said / written?
2) think that the people of the world should respect the religious wishes and sacrements of a different religion, even if it impedes on the right of freedom of expression? in other words, people should be more sensitive, understanding and tolerant to things they don't understand.
3) think that religion is a dangerous tool that when taken literally can lead to very bad things.
well i am sort of in the middle and agree with all three points (i know, way to ride the fence, ron!) but having to pick here, i would say #3 is most apt. religion is dated and dangerous and has no place in the world's power structure and retards rational thought. how is that for a stance?
i would like to hear your thoughts with explanations as to why you fell the way you do....
ok, go...
wow, it's been a long time. i see you haven't clean since i have been gone. this blog is getting dusty and miskept....
so i am reading a lot about the cartoons from the denmark newspaper that are pissing off muslims around the world. apparently any depiction of the prophet is considered blasphemous.
in this day and age, i can't believe the word blasphemous is still being written in the media. but anyway, what are your thoughts on this?
do you:
1) think that people are too sensitive and should support the freedom of expression even if they don't agree with what is being said / written?
2) think that the people of the world should respect the religious wishes and sacrements of a different religion, even if it impedes on the right of freedom of expression? in other words, people should be more sensitive, understanding and tolerant to things they don't understand.
3) think that religion is a dangerous tool that when taken literally can lead to very bad things.
well i am sort of in the middle and agree with all three points (i know, way to ride the fence, ron!) but having to pick here, i would say #3 is most apt. religion is dated and dangerous and has no place in the world's power structure and retards rational thought. how is that for a stance?
i would like to hear your thoughts with explanations as to why you fell the way you do....
ok, go...
Comments:
<< Home
Welcome back, Ron! It has been far too long!
I'm all for freedom of speech, but the cartoons are simply disrespectful, and incendiary.
Post a Comment
I'm all for freedom of speech, but the cartoons are simply disrespectful, and incendiary.
<< Home
